2013年英语一text4

admin管理员组

文章数量:1593934

　On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.

一个5:3的投票，周一最高法院推翻了a州的移民法，这对于奥巴马政府而言是一场胜利，但是对于宪法更重要的是这项决定，联邦政府：州政府是8:0。

　　An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.

A州，法官推翻了4条中的3条中a州备受争议的计划：让州和当地警察执行联邦移民法律。宪法规定只有华盛顿有权利指定统一的归化条例，且联邦政府的法律优先于州法律是没有争议的。A州尝试更新与现存联邦法律并行的州政策。

选C，文中提到州政府侵犯了联邦政府的特权。a剥夺了宪法赋予联邦警察的权利 错，文中没说。

b 打破了各州之间的平衡，错误。d 与联邦政府和州政策都有冲突 错。这个政策本来就是a州提出来的。

　　Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers

大法官K，和R和法院自由派裁定了州法律肆意挑战联邦政府的权威。在已被推翻的法律中，大多数法官认为国会故意“占领这个地方”，并且a州侵犯了联邦政府的特权。

　　However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.

但是，大法官们表示，a州警察将被允许在执法时核查相关人的合法身份在执法时，那是因为国会总是想要联邦和州一起来实行移民法，并明确鼓励州政府官员与联邦同事分享信息、一起合作。

选c。文中说，a州的警察有权在执法时核查相关人员的合法身份，也就是说，大法官认同各州在移民执法问题上的合法地位。a选项，国会一贯设想联邦政府与州政府共享信息，所以a选项：联邦政府有对移民信息保密的职责。错。B选项，各州的移民法独立于联邦移民法，错D选项，国会可以干预移民法的执行。文中只是说国会设想（envisioned）联邦政府和州政府联合实施，没有说可以干预

　　Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.

三位持反对意见的大法官中，有两位S和C，同意宪法逻辑但是不同意a州移民法与联邦法律相抵触。唯一主要的异议来自于大法官S，他提供一种对州特权的保护、这些保护甚至可以追溯到axa法。

选d。维护各州的利益。文中说唯一主要的异议来自于大法官S，他提供一种对州特权的保护、这些保护甚至可以追溯到axa法。a选项违反了宪法 错b选项破坏了各州的利益错。c选项支持联邦法错。

　　The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”. The White House argued tha Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.

这次反对奥巴马总统出现8:0的原因是，认为他在反对意见中的描述：“对联邦行政权的维护的震惊”。白宫认为，即使州法律遵循联邦法律，事实上，白宫说他可以废除任何一项他不同意的法律条文。

　　Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.

有些权利确实只属于联邦政府，包括公民身份和边界的控制权。但是如果国会想要防止州政府使用自己的资源来检查移民身份，他可以这么做，但是他没有这么做。政府实际上是在宣称，因为他不想执行国会关于移民的意愿，没有州被允许这么做。每一位法官都义正言辞地拒绝这一不同寻常的主张。

本文标签： 英语