＆QUOT;向后＆QUOT;用C条件语句

本文介绍了＆QUOT;向后＆QUOT;用C条件语句的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

我期待通过一些code和我发现了一些奇怪的条件语句，即：

I'm looking through some code and I found some strange conditionals, namely:

if (NULL != buf) {...}

我想知道是否有写有条件这样一个特别的原因，而不是

I was wondering if there was a particular reason for writing the conditional like this, instead of

if(buf != NULL){...}

我看不到任何理由这样做了我的头顶部的第一种方式，但我不认为这是一个错误。对我来说，好像他们完成同样的事情，但第二个方式是方式更直观。有没有办法使用的第一个条件的一些具体原因是什么？

I can't see any reason to do it the first way off the top of my head, but I don't think it was a mistake. To me, it seems like they accomplish the same thing, but the second way is way more intuitive. Is there some specific reason to use the first conditional?

推荐答案

是的，这就是所谓的尤达条件。我们的想法是，当你的意思是做了检查，不小心分配一个值。大多数现代编译器应该抓住它。

Yes, it's called "Yoda conditions". The idea is to not accidentally assign a value when you mean to be doing a check. Most modern compilers should catch it.