TOEFL writing详解

详解"/>

TOEFL writing详解

TOEFL

Writing

提醒一句，时态用过去式，或者现在时都可以，重点是要全文统一。\

细心的话，不难发现这几个词经常被提及：development (拓展)，details (细节), organisation (构架), cohesion (连贯), sentence structure (句型), word choice (用词), variety (多变). cost effective

名言motor: There are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people’s eyes .

As the saying goes: “the world is a book; those who do not travel read only a page”.

模板

The Introduction

• The reading and the lecture are both about _.

• The author of the reading presents three theories about _.

• The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article.

• His position is that _.

The Body Paragraphs

• According to the reading _.

• The article mentions that .

• The lecturer challenges this specific argument.

• He claims that .

• Additionally, he points out that __.

• Secondly, the author suggests __.

• In the article, it is said that _.

• The lecturer, however, asserts that __.

• He goes on to say that __.

• Finally, the author posits that _.

• The author contends that .

• In contrast, the lecturer’s stance is _.

• He notes that _.

In the reading material, the author cites three reasons to support his viewpoint/solutions to solve the problems that().Nevertheless,the lecturer in the listening material chanllenges that() and opposes the points in the reading material.

First and foremost, the author argues that(). However,the lecturer offers an opposite stand that().

In addition, the lecturer casts doubt on the author’s another reason that(reading P2),demonstrating that (listening P2).

Eventually, the author’s third reason that() is counteracted by the lecturer who points out that().It is said that

In the final analysis, the professor convincingly shows that none of the evidence/explanation in the reading passage provides sufficient support for ...

 type2

independent writing

1.阐述背景，转述题目

In the reading material, the author cites three reasons to support his viewpoint that Brendan the Navigator was the first Europeans to reach North America during their voyage. Nevertheless, the lecturer in the listening material argues that the argument raised by the author might not be real