这更像是一个 CS 问题,但很有趣:
This is more of a CS question, but an interesting one :
假设我们有 2 个树结构,其中重组了或多或少相同的节点.你怎么找
Let's say we have 2 tree structures with more or less the same nodes reorganized. How would you find
操作顺序
- MOVE(A, B) - 将节点 A 移动到节点 B 下(包括整个子树)
- INSERT(N, B) - 在节点 B 下插入一个 新 节点 N
- DELETE (A) - 删除节点 A(包括整个子树)
- MOVE(A, B) - moves node A under node B (with the whole subtree)
- INSERT(N, B) - inserts a new node N under node B
- DELETE (A) - deletes the node A (with the whole subtree)
将一棵树变成另一棵树.
that transforms one tree to the other.
显然在某些情况下这种转换是不可能的,比如根 A 和孩子 B 到根 B 和孩子 A 等等).在这种情况下,算法只会给出不可能"的结果.
There might obviously be cases where such transformation is not possible, trivial being root A with child B to root B with child A etc.). In such cases, the algorithm would simply deliver an result "not possible".
更壮观的版本是网络的泛化,即当我们假设一个节点可以在树中多次出现(实际上有多个父节点"),而循环是被禁止的.
Even more spectacular version is a generalization for networks, i.e. when we assume that a node can occur multiple times in the tree (effectively having multiple "parents"), while cycles are forbidden.
免责声明:这不是作业,实际上它来自一个真正的业务问题,我发现这很有趣,想知道是否有人可能知道解决方案.
Disclaimer : This is not a homework, actually it comes from a real business problem and I found it quite interesting wondering if somebody might know a solution.
推荐答案不仅有一篇关于图同构的维基百科文章(正如 Space_C0wb0y 指出的),还有一篇关于 图同构问题.它有一个部分已解决的特殊情况,其中多项式时间的解决方案是已知的.Trees 就是其中之一,它引用了以下两个参考文献:
There is not only a Wikipedia article on graph isomorphism (as Space_C0wb0y points out) but also a dedicated article on the graph isomorphism problem. It has a section Solved special cases for which polynomial-time solutions are known. Trees is one of them and it cites the following two references:
- P.J.凯利,树的同余定理"太平洋 J. 数学,7 (1957) pp. 961–968
- 啊,阿尔弗雷德 V.;霍普克罗夫特,约翰;Ullman, Jeffrey D. (1974),计算机算法的设计和分析,雷丁,马萨诸塞州:Addison–Wesley.
更多推荐
计算使两个树结构相同的最小操作
发布评论