Lambda函数

本文介绍了Lambda函数的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

在C ++中，通常使用lambda和函数对象而不是函数指针来工作。原因是lambda或函数对象的类型完全对要调用的内容进行编码（从而允许内联），而函数指针的类型仅对签名进行编码。我有一个有趣的想法，当使用通用代码创建调用给定函数的lambda时，它可能会很有用。换句话说，给定指定函数的高阶函数将返回调用它的lambda。为了避免任何间接访问，必须使用函数指针非类型模板参数。问题是要指定这样的非类型模板参数，您必须知道函数的签名。我无法解决需要两次传递有问题的函数的问题：一次推论类型，一次真正专注于函数。我的最佳尝试是这样的：

It's often useful in C++ to work with lambdas and function objects, rather than function pointers. The reason being that a lambda's or function object's type fully encodes what is getting called (and thus allows inlining), whereas a function pointer's type merely encodes the signature. I had the interesting thought that it might be useful when using generic code to create a lambda that calls a given function. In other words, a higher order function that given a specified function, returns a lambda that calls it. To avoid any indirection, function pointer non-type template parameters have to be used. The problem is that to specify such a non-type template parameter, you have to know the signature of the function. I'm not able to get around needing to pass the function in question twice: once to deduce the types, and once to actually specialize on the function. My best attempt looks like this:

template <class T> struct makeLambdaHelper; template <class R, class ... Args> struct makeLambdaHelper<R(*)(Args...)> { template <void(*F)(Args...)> static auto blah() { return [] (Args && ... args) { return F(std::forward<Args>(args)...); }; } };

要使用此功能，您可以这样做：

To use this, you would do:

void f(int, int) { std::cerr << "f\n"; }; ... auto lam = makeLambdaHelper<decltype(&f)>::blah<f>(); lam(0,0);

将f的类型作为模板参数传递给makeLambdaHelper时，首先推导出其签名。然后该结构具有一个静态函数，该函数声明一个非类型的模板参数。所以我们通过f本身，得到一个lambda。像这样不得不两次通过f是非常丑陋的。是否有可能做得更好，也许可以通过使用默认模板参数做一些聪明的事情？

When f's type is passed as the template argument to makeLambdaHelper, first its signature is deduced. Then the struct has a static function that declares a non-type template parameter; so we pass f itself, and get out a lambda. Having to pass f twice like this is pretty ugly; is it possible to do better, maybe by doing something clever with default template parameters?

推荐答案

如果只想包装一个函数指针指向函数对象，建议使用宏：

If you just want to wrap a function pointer in a function object, I'd recommend a macro:

#define WRAP_FN(f) [](auto&&... args) -> decltype(auto) { \ return f(std::forward<decltype(args)>(args)...); };

使用方式如下：

auto lam = WRAP_FN(foo);

宏的优点是它还会处理重载名称-这样您就可以将重载函数传递到std算法中，并使它们执行您想要的操作。

The advantage of the macro is that it'll additionally handle overloaded names - so that you can pass overloaded functions into std algorithms and have that do what you want it to.