.NET 2.0的未来

本文介绍了.NET 2.0的未来的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

您好， 我对.NET Framework的未来有疑问。什么是.NET 2.0 Framework的 后继者？ WinFX的？如果它是WinFX，它将与.NET 2.0大不相同吗？我的应用程序是否为.NET开发 2.0也可以使用新的WinFX运行？ 我听说Microsoft将来支持.NET Framework比其他MS编程语言（例如MFC C ++）更多 。 .NET Framework语言是未来的编程语言还是 它们会在未来10年被遗忘吗？

Hello, I''ve a question about the future of the .NET Framework. What will be the successor of the .NET 2.0 Framework? WinFX? If it will be WinFX, will it be much different to the .NET 2.0 and will my applications developed for .NET 2.0 also run with the new WinFX? I heard that Microsoft will support the .NET Framework in the future more than other MS programming languages (for example MFC C++). Are the .NET Framework languages are pogramming languages for the future or will they be forgotten in the next 10 years for example?

推荐答案

你好DHarry， D>我对.NET Framework的未来有疑问。什么是 D> .NET 2.0 Framework的后继者？ WinFX的？如果它是WinFX， D>它会与.NET 2.0有很大的不同吗？我的应用程序将会是什么？ D>为.NET 2.0开发的还可以使用新的WinFX运行吗？ WinFX是一组技术，如Avalon，Indigo等。它更多的库 方式ragther那个框架。 ..NET 2.0给了他们一个基础。 你的应用程序不依赖于WinFX，winFX只是给你新功能。 D>我听说微软将来会支持.NET Framework D>更多 D>比其他MS编程语言（例如MFC C ++）。 一切都取决于你写的是什么。目前C ++ / COM具有电源功能 即使与.NET一起使用，特别是使用CLR。 C ++ / COM将存活很长时间，但没有什么可以开发更多。 ..NET简化你的工作并且它不完美，需要开发很多东西 越来越多 D> .NET Framework语言是用于 D>的编程语言吗？未来或 D>他们会在未来10年被遗忘吗？ 你有什么担心？ --- WBR， Michael Nemtsev ::博客： http：/ /spaces.msn/laflour 有时一个人仍然忠实于一个事业只因为它的对手没有 停止平淡无奇。 （c）Friedrich Nietzsche Hello DHarry, D> I''ve a question about the future of the .NET Framework. What will be D> the successor of the .NET 2.0 Framework? WinFX? If it will be WinFX, D> will it be much different to the .NET 2.0 and will my applications D> developed for .NET 2.0 also run with the new WinFX? WinFX is a set of technologies, like Avalon, Indigo and etc. It''s more library way ragther that framework. ..NET 2.0 gives them a base. You apps don''t depend on WinFX, winFX just gives u new features. D> I heard that Microsoft will support the .NET Framework in the future D> more D> than other MS programming languages (for example MFC C++). Everything depends on what are u writing. For now C++/COM has power functionality even to work with .NET, especially with CLR. C++/COM will live long, but there is nothing to develop more. ..NET simplify you work and it''s not perfect, a lot of things need to be developed more and more D> Are the .NET Framework languages are pogramming languages for the D> future or D> will they be forgotten in the next 10 years for example? What do u worry about? --- WBR, Michael Nemtsev :: blog: spaces.msn/laflour "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

DHarry， WinFX在.NET 2.0上运行，所以如果MS继续支持WinFX，MS将继续支持.NET b 。此外，MS继续支持MFC，即使它现在是.NET的红头发儿童。 .NET会消失吗？我对此表示怀疑。作为证据，我提供以下内容。 你听说过奇点吗？请查看： research.microsoft / os / singularity / 这是正确的......微软试图用.NET编写一个操作系统，并从中获取 我读过，做过相当不错的工作。 .NET不会随时消失 很快 - 虽然我希望名字会这样。 DHarry, WinFX runs on .NET 2.0, so if MS continues to support WinFX, MS will continue to support .NET. Also, MS continues to support MFC, even though it''s now the red-headed stepchild to .NET. Will .NET go away? I doubt it. As evidence, I offer the following. Have you ever heard of singularity? Check it out: research.microsoft/os/singularity/ That''s right... Microsoft tried to write an OS in .NET, and from what I''ve read, did a fairly decent job of it. .NET isn''t going away anytime soon -- although I wish the name would.

我从未听说过奇点之前......但哇......它给了我一个新的意见 关于.NET。 我经常阅读并听说微软说 ; .NET是未来的并且 这就是我打开这个帖子的原因。 我之前从未听说MS在.NET中写过一个应用程序（不包括 ） 奇点但为什么呢？因为安全还是逆向工程？对于 示例，为什么MS Office不是用.NET编写的？！ 好​​的...奇点......它是一个研究项目，取决于我的知识 来自德国的问候 I never heard from Singularity before... but wow... it gives me a new opinion about .NET. I often read and heard that Microsoft said that ".NET is the future" and that''s the reason I opened this thread. I never heard before that MS wrote an application in .NET (excluding "Singularity") But why? Because of security or reverse engeneering? For example why is MS Office not written in .NET?! Ok... Singularity... it''s a research project, and depending on my knownledge about the strategies of Microsoft, I don''t believe that MS will release anytime (to unsecure, reverse engeneering, ...) (...) The reason I asked for the future of .NET, is that I want to specialise me on one language for my applications released next. I''m looking after a secure, new and powerfull language which won''t be "out" in the next years. Greets from Germany