使用敏捷建造飞机？

本文介绍了使用敏捷建造飞机？的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

开发人员可以从其他行业中学到很多东西。作为一种思想练习，是否可以使用敏捷技术制造客机？

Developers can learn a lot from other industries. As a thought exercise, is it possible to build a passenger aircraft using agile techniques?

暂时忘记成本；在硬件（机身，机翼等）和软件上使用迭代和增量式开发，同时仍能提供满足客户要求的安全，有效的产品，这是多么可行？

Forgetting cost for now; how feasible is it to use iterative and incremental development for both the hardware (fuselage, wings, etc) as well as software, and still come out with a working and safe product which meets the customer’s requirements at the time of delivery?

重构飞机有意义吗？

推荐答案

我要去说有点。实际上，现在有一个例子，我认为已经很接近回答这个问题了。

I'm going to say "kind of". In fact there's one example right now that I think is pretty close to answering this question.

波音公司现在正尝试使用新型787做到这一点-请参阅以下内容：波音787-规格与协作 （从777到787，随着技术的变化，最初的规格文档据称已从2500页增加到20页。）来自世界各地的供应商正在独立开发该飞机的组件。 （我们称其为团队。）

Boeing is attempting to do this now with the new 787 - see following: Boeing 787 - Specification vs. Collaboration (From the 777 to the 787, the initial specifications document supposedly went from 2500 pages to 20 pages with the change in technique.) Suppliers from around the world are working independently to develop the components for this aircraft. (We'll call this the "teams".)

因此，我想说是，但与此同时，在创建飞机时的迭代有导致延迟超过2年，并导致类似这样的故事-（ 787第五次延误）

So, I want to say yes, but at the same time, iterations in creating the aircraft has resulted in delays of 2+ years and has resulted in stories like this one - (787 Delayed for 5th Time)

飞机会建成吗？是的，当然可以。但是，当您看到这里遇到的麻烦时，似乎集成测试一次来了一次。

Will the airplane ever get built? Yes, of course it will. But when you look at the rubber hitting the road here, it seems like "integration test" is having one heck of a time.

编辑：同时，这技术的变化导致了采用全新材料制造的新型飞机的诞生，可以说这将是世界上最先进的飞机之一。这可能是更敏捷方法的直接结果。也许这实际上是一个问题-不是可以吗？但是如果敏捷延迟了复杂的系统，它是否会在收益方面提供更具创新性的产品？

At the same time, this shift in technique has resulted in building a new breed of aircraft built out of entirely new materials that will arguably be one of the most advanced in the world. This may be a direct result of the more Agile approach. Maybe that's actually the question - not a "can you?" but a "if Agile delays complex systems, does it provide a more innovative product in the payoff?"