通过子聚集结果值对术语聚集桶进行排序

如何按 value ？ 我在查询中再次使用 respsize ，但是如下所示，它是不正确的。

How do I order by value in the sum_category field in the results? I use respsize again in the query but it's not correct as you can see below.

即使我仅进行了汇总，为什么所有文档都附带结果？我的意思是，如果我在SQL中进行 group by 查询，它将仅检索分组的数据，但是Elasticsearch检索所有文档，就像我进行常规搜索查询一样。我怎么跳过它们？

Even if I make only an aggregration, why do all the documents come with the result? I mean, if I make a group by query in SQL it retrieves only grouped data, but Elasticsearch retrieves all documents as if I made a normal search query. How do I skip them?

尝试一下：

1）。有关您的排序的操作，请参见（2）中的注释。至于按sum_category的值对类别进行排序，请参见 order 部分。似乎存在与该 github/elastic/elasticsearch相关的古老且封闭的问题/ issues / 4643 ，但在Elasticsearch v1.5.2版本中对我来说效果很好。

1). See the note in (2) for what your sort is doing. As for ordering the categories by the value of sum_category, see the order portion. There appears to be an old and closed issue related to that github/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/4643 but it worked fine for me with v1.5.2 of Elasticsearch.

2）。尽管您没有该match_all查询，但我认为这可能是您得到的结果。因此，您指定的排序实际上已应用于这些结果。为了不让它们回来，我只提供了 size：0 部分。

2). Although you do not have that match_all query, I think that's probably what you are getting results for. And so the sort your specified is actually getting applied to those results. To not get these back, I just have size: 0 portion.

是否要为所有类别使用存储桶？我注意到您没有为主要集合指定大小。这就是 size：999999 部分。

Do you want buckets for all the categories? I noticed you do not have size specified for the main aggregation. That's the size: 999999 portion.