BPMN的优缺点?

本文介绍了BPMN的优缺点?的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

我希望您能从开发人员的角度告诉我BPMN的优缺点.

I was hoping you could tell me what the advantages and disadvantages of BPMN are in a developers perspective.

我正在将UML与BPMN进行比较，发现UML有很多优点和缺点，而BPMN没有.

I'm comparing UML with BPMN and a found a bunch of advantages and disadvanteges for UML but none for BPMN.

推荐答案

很大程度上取决于受众和目标.在建模语言方面，BPMN和UML活动图使用不同的符号覆盖几乎相同的概念空间.记号的东西很快就变得虔诚了.与BPMN相比，我个人更喜欢AD表示法-但这是非常个人的事情.

It's largely down to audience and purpose. In terms of modelling language, BPMN and UML activity diagrams cover pretty much the same conceptual space with different notations. The notation thing gets religious very quickly. I personally prefer AD notation over BPMN - but it's a very personal thing.

从广义上讲，BPMN倾向于受到来自业务流程建模/业务分析背景的人的青睐.从软件角度来看，UML AD倾向于受到那些人的青睐.工具支持倾向于反映这一点:高端流程建模工具(casewise，aris等)更可能支持BPMN；软件建模工具(MagicDraw，Sparx等)支持UML.但是，那里的分频越来越多.我与业务涉众都使用了这两种方法，两种情况都没有问题.

Broadly speaking, BPMN tends to find favour with those coming from a business process modelling / business analysis background. UML ADs tend to be favoured by those coming from a software perspective. Tool support tends to mirror this: the high end process modelling tools (casewise, aris, etc.) are more likely to support BPMN; software modelling tools (MagicDraw, Sparx, etc.) favour UML. However there's increasing crossover there. I've used both with business stakeholders with no issues in either case.

最后是目的.您的图是仅供人类使用还是用作某种形式的分析/代码生成的规范?如果不仅仅是图片，那么您的工具链可能就是决定因素.

Finally is purpose. Are your diagrams going to be for human consumption only or used as a specification for some form of analysis/code generation? If it's not just pictures then your tool chain may well be the deciding factor.

如果您想更详细地说明差异，请查看此论坛帖子.

If you want a more detailed description of the differences, have a look at the answer in this forum post.