协方差在不同的FW导致code打破？

本文介绍了协方差在不同的FW导致code打破？的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

我看到乔恩斯基特的讲座在NDC 2010

I saw Jon Skeet's lecture at the NDC 2010

他提到的一些有趣的事情：

He mentioned something interesting :

public Class Base { public void Foo(IEnumerable<string> strings){} } public Class Child:Base { publc void Foo(IEnumerable<object> objects) {} } Main : List<string> lst = new List<string>(); lst.Add("aaa"); Child c = new Child(); c.Foo(lst);

使用C＃3，它会调用： Base.Foo

With C# 3 it will call : Base.Foo

使用C＃4，它会调用： Child.Foo

With C# 4 it will call : Child.Foo

我知道这是因为协方差

问：

是不是有点code重大更改？ 有任何解决方法所以这code将继续工作，因为它是在版本3？

Isn't it a bit code breaking change ? Is there any workaround so this code will continue work as it was on ver 3?

推荐答案

是的，这是一个重大更改。任何时候你犯了一个prevously-无效转换的法律，这是一个重大更改。

Yes, it's a breaking change. Any time you make a prevously-invalid conversion legal, it's a breaking change.

不幸的是，这是非常困难的特性添加到语言未做的任意的重大更改。如果你的周边有活动多了一些在C＃4真的的想看看他们。这是不可能的，这些都会影响当然，大多数开发商。

Unfortunately, it's very hard to add features to the language without making any breaking changes. There are a few more around events in C# 4 if you really want to look for them. It's unlikely that these will affect most developers, of course.

在一些情况中使用的实施将有不同的版本之间改变了这个code C＃1和C＃2之间类似的重大更改：

There were similar breaking changes between C# 1 and C# 2, where the implementation used would have changed between different versions for this code:

using System; public delegate void StringAction(string x); public class Base { public void Foo(string x) { Console.WriteLine("Base"); } } public class Child : Base { public void Foo(object x) { Console.WriteLine("Child"); } } public class Test { static void Main() { Child c = new Child(); StringAction action = new StringAction(c.Foo); action("x"); } }

在这种情况下，编译器实际上给出了一个警告：

In this case the compiler actually gives a warning:

Test.cs(26,31): warning CS1707: Delegate 'StringAction' bound to 'Child.Foo(object)' instead of 'Base.Foo(string)' because of new language rules