无法将SQL转换为LINQ

编程入门 行业动态 更新时间:2024-10-27 18:27:23
本文介绍了无法将SQL转换为LINQ的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧! 问题描述

我是LINQ的新手。我有一个下面的SQL查询,我正在尝试获得LINQ等效语句。

I am new to LINQ. I have a folowing SQL query and I am trying to get LINQ equivalent statement.

SELECT orgNm.OrgNm FROM OrgNm orgNM INNER JOIN ProspectClient pc ON orgNM.OrgNmTypeId = 2 AND pc.ProspectClientID = orgNm.OrgId AND orgNm.OrgId NOT IN (SELECT CloneOrgId FROM ClonedOrgInfo) AND orgnmId NOT IN (SELECT RelatedOrgId FROM OrgcRlshp)

谢谢... AJ 已添加代码块,''SQL ''标签已添加[/ Edit]

Thanks... AJ Code block added, ''SQL'' tag added[/Edit]

推荐答案

让我们澄清,因为你在JOIN ON子句中添加了一些内容,并不意味着它属于那里。您的查询应该是这样的: Let''s clarify, just because you add something in the JOIN ON clause, does not mean it belongs there. Your query should be this one: SELECT orgNm.OrgNm FROM OrgNm orgNM INNER JOIN ProspectClient pc ON pc.ProspectClientID = orgNm.OrgId WHERE orgNM.OrgNmTypeId = 2 AND orgNm.OrgId NOT IN (SELECT CloneOrgId FROM ClonedOrgInfo) AND orgnmId NOT IN (SELECT RelatedOrgId FROM OrgcRlshp)

以下是三个步骤的可能解释:

Here is one possible interpretation in three steps:

var re = from o in OrgNm join pc in ProspectClient on o.OrgId = pc.ProspectClientID where o.OrgNmTypeId = 2; var ex = ClonedOrgInfo.Select(x => x.CloneOrgId).Union(OrgcRlshp.Select(y => y.RelatedOrgId)); var result = re.Where(r => !ex.Contains(re.OrgId));

由于LINQ to SQL使用延迟执行,因此使用的步数无关紧要。

Since LINQ to SQL is using deferred execution, it does not matter how many steps you use.

非常感谢ZoltánZörgő...你的解决方案解决了我的问题! 因为我是LINQ的新手,可以你建议我一个更好的方法/知识库,我可以利用我的LINQ编码技巧吗? 问候 AJ Thanks a ton, Zoltán Zörgő... Your solution solves my question! As I am new to LINQ, could you suggest me a better approach/knowledge base where I can leverage my LINQ coding skills? Regards AJ

更多推荐

无法将SQL转换为LINQ

本文发布于:2023-11-10 02:54:41,感谢您对本站的认可!
本文链接:https://www.elefans.com/category/jswz/34/1574149.html
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。
本文标签:转换为   SQL   LINQ

发布评论

评论列表 (有 0 条评论)
草根站长

>www.elefans.com

编程频道|电子爱好者 - 技术资讯及电子产品介绍!