在c＃中使用c ++ dll的main函数是否可以

本文介绍了在c＃中使用c ++ dll的main函数是否可以的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

我创建了一个c ++ dll，其中我返回一个最初作为参数传递给它的修改过的字符串， i我在c＃中调用main函数使用

i have created a c++ dll in which i am returning a modified string originally passed to it as argument, i am calling main function in my c# using

[DllImport("StringManupulation.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl)] static extern IntPtr main(string a);

可以使用这样的主要功能，我没有要求再调用除main之外的其他功能。 你也将如何在c＃~main（）的每次调用中破坏主函数分配的内存？我想在它们返回值后删除c＃中指针分配的memroy ifstream :: pos_type size; char * memblock; char * CodeSend; //逻辑在这里 删除[ ] memblock; delete [] CodeSend; 返回CodeSend; 但这在我的情况下不起作用

is it ok to use main function like that, i dont have requriement to call any more functions other than main. also how would you destory the memory allocated by main function in each call from c# ~main() ? i want to delete the memroy allocated by pointer in c# after they have returned value ifstream::pos_type size; char * memblock; char* CodeSend; //logic here delete [] memblock; delete [] CodeSend; return CodeSend; but this would not work in my case

推荐答案

一个DLL文件不应该有一个 main fucntion - 它意味着它有一个入口点，可以单独运行 - 它不应该。 因为你创建了DLL，我会重命名函数ModString或者描述它对参数的作用 - 这就是代码使用它更自我记录。 要释放内存，我有一个发布方法，或者更好的是在已经分配的块中有C＃传递该函数可以放置修改后的版本的内存。如果你那样做，那么确保你不会因内存泄漏而更加安全和容易。 A DLL file shouldn't have a main fucntion - it implies it has an entry point and can be run in isolation - which it shouldn't. Since you created the DLL, I'd rename the function "ModString" or something which describes what it does to the parameter - that way the code using it is more self documenting. To deallocate the memory, I'd have a "release" method, or better still have the C# pass in an already allocated block of memory in which the function can place the modified version. It's a lot safer and easier than trying to ensure you don't end up with memory leaks if you do it that way.

答案是：不！ 1.这是一个保留名称，所以它不会被使用。 2.使用说话名称也是一种对话，所以每个人（甚至在10年内）都知道这个功能是什么。 The answer is: No! 1. It is a "reserved name" so it makes sence not to used. 2. It is also convetion to use "speaking name" so everybody (even in 10 years) know what the function makes.