“方法"与“消息"与“功能"与"???"

本文介绍了“方法"与“消息"与“功能"与"???"的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

我最近问了一个有关我所谓的方法调用"的问题.答案是消息".作为一个自学成才的业余程序员，我试图表达那些不会让我看起来像个白痴的问题，因此我意识到，我所使用的术语在很大程度上揭示了我如何学习编程.

方法/消息/等的各种术语之间是否有区别?在OO编程中?这是不同的编程语言使用不同的术语来描述相似概念的区别吗?

我似乎记得在OO之前的语言中，有时会根据是否期望返回值来区分子例程"和函数"，但是即使那样，这仍是一种语言对语言的区分. ?

解决方案

我发现这是一种语言和编程范例.一种范例-OOP-指的是带有成员方法的对象，从概念上讲，它们是您如何向这些对象发送消息的方式(例如，该视图反映在UML中).

另一个范式-功能性-可能涉及对象类别，也可能不涉及对象类别，但是功能是工作的基本单元.

在结构化编程中，您具有子例程(请注意，前缀"sub"表示结构).

在命令式编程中(与结构化结构有很多重叠，但是看待事物的方式略有不同)，您对世界的看法更加公式化，因此函数"表示某种操作(通常是数学上的). /p>

听起来像卢布一样，您要做的就是将语言参考所使用的​​术语用于您所使用的语言.

I recently asked a question about what I called "method calls". The answer referred to "messages". As a self-taught hobby programmer trying to phrase questions that don't make me look like an idiot, I'm realizing that the terminology that I use reveals a lot about how I learned to program.

Is there a distinction between the various terms for methods/messages/etc. in OO programming? Is this a difference that comes from different programming languages using different terminology to describe similar concepts?

I seem to remember that in pre-OO languages, a distinction would sometimes be made between "subroutines" and "functions" based on whether a return value was expected, but even then, was this a language-by-language distinction?

解决方案

I've found this to be a language and programming-paradigm thing. One paradigm — OOP — refers to objects with member methods, which conceptually are how you send messages to those objects (this view is reflected in UML, for example).

Another paradigm — functional — may or may not involve classes of objects, but functions are the atomic unit of work.

In structured programming, you had sub-routines (notice that the prefix "sub" implies structure).

In imperative programming (which overlaps with structured quite a lot, but a slightly different way of looking at things), you have a more formulaic view of the world, and so 'functions' represent some operation (often mathematical).

All you have to do to not sound like a rube is to use the terminology used by the language reference for the language you're using.