Rhino模拟一个抽象类而不模拟其虚拟方法？

本文介绍了Rhino模拟一个抽象类而不模拟其虚拟方法？的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

我可以执行驻留在使用Rhino Mocks模拟的抽象类上的虚拟方法的主体吗？

Can I execute the body of a virtual method that lives on an abstract class which has been mocked using Rhino Mocks?

要明确的是，我没有尝试模拟虚拟方法的行为。我正在尝试/ test /虚拟方法（在模拟类上）。

To be clear, I'm not trying to mock the behavior of the virtual method. I'm trying to /test/ the virtual method (on the mocked class).

这个想法是否公然滥用了Rhino Mocks？

Is this idea a blatant misuse of Rhino Mocks?

推荐答案

是的，那绝对没问题。我不能说我已经尝试过了，但是如果失败了，我会感到非常惊讶。

Yes, that should be absolutely fine. I can't say I've tried it, but I'd be very surprised if it failed.

编辑：我怀疑您想要 PartialMock 方法。例如：

I suspect you want the PartialMock method. Here's an example:

using System; using Rhino.Mocks; public abstract class Abstract { public virtual int Foo() { return Bar() * 2; } public abstract int Bar(); } class Test { static void Main(string[] args) { MockRepository repository = new MockRepository(); Abstract mock = repository.PartialMock<Abstract>(); using (repository.Record()) { Expect.Call(mock.Bar()).Return(5); } Console.WriteLine(mock.Foo()); // Prints 10 } }

编辑：或者是我第一次尝试在AAA：

Or in my first attempt at AAA:

using System; using Rhino.Mocks; public abstract class Abstract { public virtual int Foo() { return Bar() * 2; } public abstract int Bar(); } class Test { static void Main(string[] args) { // Arrange Abstract mock = MockRepository.GeneratePartialMock<Abstract>(); mock.Stub(action => action.Bar()).Return(5); // Act int result = mock.Foo(); // Assert mock.AssertWasCalled(x => x.Bar()); // And assert that result is 10... } }