所以,假设我想为 PartialFunction 提供一个全能"后备:
So, suppose, I want to provide a "catch all" fall back for a PartialFunction:
val foo: PartialFunction[Int, String] = { case 1 => "foo" } val withDefault = foo orElse { _.toString }这不会编译:缺少扩展函数的参数类型 ((x$1) => x$1.toString).这:
val withDefault = foo orElse { case x: Int => x.toString }也不编译(同样的错误).
Does not compile either (same error).
这个:
val withDefault = foo orElse { (x: Int) => x.toString }因 类型不匹配而失败;发现:Int =>细绳;需要:PartialFunction[?,?]
我能找到的让它起作用的唯一方法是拼写整个事情:
The only way I could find to make it work is to spell out the whole thing:
val withDefault = foo orElse PartialFunction[Int, String] { _.toString }有没有更好的语法?我的意思是,一个不必告诉它我正在将一个部分函数从 int 传递到 string 到它期望从 in 到 string 接收部分函数的地方.这一点都不含糊,我为什么要这样做?
Is there any better syntax for this? I mean, one without having to tell it that I am passing a partial function from int to string to where it expects to receive a partial function from in to string. This is not ambiguous at all, why do I have to do this?
推荐答案也许你需要applyOrElse:
val withDefault = foo.applyOrElse(_: Int, (_: Int).toString)或者你可能想要这样的东西:
Or maybe you would like something like this:
implicit class PartialFunToFun[A,B](val f: PartialFunction[A,B]) extends AnyVal { def withDefault(bar: A => B) = f.applyOrElse[A,B](_: A, bar) }并使用它:foo.withDefault(_.toString)(1)
此外,如果您只想获得另一个 PartialFunction,您可以使用下一个语法:
Also if you want to get just another PartialFunction you can use the next syntax:
val withDefault = foo.orElse[Int, String]{case x => x.toString}更多推荐
将 PartialFunction 与常规函数结合
发布评论