我一直在阅读 HashMap , HashSet 和 HashTable 之间的区别.我注意到的关键是,我看到 HashMap / HashSet 在 HashTable 处于同步状态时不同步.
I've been reading up on the differences between a HashMap, HashSet, and HashTable. A key thing I've been noticing is that I've seen that HashMap/HashSet are not synchronized while a HashTable is.
但是,在我之前看到的代码库中,有好几个地方使用了这样的块:
However in a code base that I've seen before there are several places where a block like this is used:
synchronized (hashSet) { //Some code involving the hashset }如果 HashSet 不同步,怎么办?同步块是否仅允许我们使用非同步数据结构,就好像它已同步一样?
How is this possible if a HashSet isn't synchronized? Does the synchronized block simply allow us to use a non synchronous data structure as if it were synchronized?
如果 HashSet 是同步的,我们是否就不必包含synced(){}块了吗?
If HashSet were synchronized would we just not have to include the synchronized() {} block?
推荐答案一个 Synchronized 块需要一些对象进行同步.当说 HashSet 是不同步的时,这仅意味着它的方法本身并不同步,如果您打算在多线程上下文中使用它,则应自己处理同步(例如,如代码段所示,通过对 HashSet 对象进行 synchronization ).
A synchronized block requires some object to syncronize upon. When a HashSet is said to be unsynchronized it just means that it's methods aren't synchronized in their own right, and if you intend to use it in a multi-threaded context, you should handle synchronization by yourself (e.g., by synchronizing on the HashSet object as shown in your snippet).
更多推荐
(Java)如果不同步,为什么允许HashSet同步使用?
发布评论