我需要做StringIO.close()吗?

本文介绍了我需要做StringIO.close()吗?的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

一些代码:

import cStringIO def f(): buffer = cStringIO.StringIO() buffer.write('something') return buffer.getvalue()

文档说:

StringIO.close():释放内存缓冲区.尝试做进一步 关闭StringIO对象的操作将引发ValueError.

StringIO.close(): Free the memory buffer. Attempting to do further operations with a closed StringIO object will raise a ValueError.

我是否必须执行buffer.close()，否则当缓冲区超出范围并被垃圾回收时，它将自动发生?

Do I have to do buffer.close(), or it will happen automatically when buffer goes out of scope and is garbage collected?

更新:

我做了一个测试:

import StringIO, weakref def handler(ref): print 'Buffer died!' def f(): buffer = StringIO.StringIO() ref = weakref.ref(buffer, handler) buffer.write('something') return buffer.getvalue() print 'before f()' f() print 'after f()'

结果:

vic@wic:~/projects$ python test.py before f() Buffer died! after f() vic@wic:~/projects$

推荐答案

通常最好还是调用close()或使用with语句，因为在特殊情况下可能会出现某些意外行为.例如，expat- IncrementalParser似乎期望文件被关闭，否则在某些罕见情况下，除非发生超时，否则它不会返回已解析的xml的最后提示.

Generally it's still better to call close() or use the with statement, because there may be some unexpected behaviour in special circumstances. For example, the expat-IncrementalParser seems to expect a file to be closed, or it won't return the last tidbit of parsed xml until a timeout occurs in some rare circumstances.

但是对于要为您处理结账的with语句，您必须使用io -Modules中的StringIO类，如Ivc的注释所述.

But for the with-statement, which handles the closing for you, you have to use the StringIO class from the io-Modules, as stated in the comment of Ivc.

这对于我们通过手动关闭StringIO解决的某些旧式sax解析器脚本来说是一个严重的麻烦.

This was a major headache in some legacy sax-parser script we solved by closing the StringIO manually.

范围外"关闭无效.它只是在等待超时限制.

The "out-of-scope" close didn't work. It just waited for the timeout-limit.