我正在开发闭源的商业应用为Android。而我使用提供了Apache 2.0许可GSON库。我只是链接JAR文件。
现在..有使用破版本GSON的特定设备中的错误: $c$c.google/p/google-gson/issues/detail?id=255
我是受影响的。
要解决的问题 - 我正在GSON来源,并纳入到我的项目只有改变包名
。问:
我可以把它关闭源?
我可以出售这个程序?
我可以卖源?
我应该把一些在源文件?在所有50个左右?如果是的话,究竟应该怎么放呢?
我不是律师,但是:
是的。见再分配部分。
您可以复制和分发作品或衍生作品的复制品在任何媒介体,带或不带修改,以源代码形式或目标形式
是的。
每个贡献者授予用户永久性的,全球性,非排他性的,不收费,免版税的,不可撤销的(除非在本节所述),专利授权制造,已经制造,使用,许诺销售,销售,进口,以及以其他方式转让工作
是的。再次看到再分配。
从技术上讲,我觉得你真的需要给的Apache 2.0许可副本,用户反正你是否不能修改GSON。
I'm developing closed-source commercial application for Android. And I'm using GSON library provided with Apache 2.0 license. I was just linking JAR file..
NOW.. There is a bug with specific devices using broken version of GSON: code.google/p/google-gson/issues/detail?id=255
I'm affected.
To solve issue - I'm taking GSON sources and incorporate into my project changing package names only.
QUESTION:
Can I keep it close-source?
Can I sell this app?
Can I sell source?
Should I put something in source files? In all 50 or so ? If yes, what exactly should I put there?
解决方案
I'm not a lawyer, but:
Yes. See the Redistribution section.
You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form
Yes.
each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work
Yes. See Redistribution again.
Technically, I think you actually need to give a copy of the Apache 2.0 license to users anyway whether or not you modify GSON.
更多推荐
Apache 2.0许可。我应该如何处理呢?
发布评论