这是怎么回事?两种形式的除非"有什么微妙的区别?
>irb(main):001:0>foo = true 除非定义?(foo)=>零irb(main):002:0>除非定义?(fooo) ;foo = 假;结尾=>错误的谢谢
解决方案显然,ruby 在解析时创建了局部变量,将它们设置为 nil 所以它是定义的,无论代码是否执行都会这样做与否.
当代码在你的第一行被评估时,它不会执行赋值部分,因为 foo 被设置为 nil.在第二行,因为 fooo 还没有被解析, defined? 返回 nil 让块内的代码执行并分配 foo.
举个例子,你可以试试这个:
如果为假富 = 43结尾定义?富=>局部变量"本文摘自 ruby-forum 的一个论坛帖子.>
What's going on here? What is the subtle difference between the two forms of "unless"?
> irb(main):001:0> foo = true unless defined?(foo) => nil irb(main):002:0> unless defined?(fooo) ; fooo = false ; end => falsethx
解决方案Apparently, ruby creates local variable at parse time setting them to nilso it is defined and this is done whether the code is executed or not.
When the code is evaluated at your first line, it doesn't execute the assignment part since foo is set to nil. In the second line, because fooo has not been parsed yet, defined?returns nil letting the code inside the block execute and assign fooo.
As an example you can try this:
if false foo = 43 end defined? foo => "local-variable"This is taken from a forum post at ruby-forum.
更多推荐
在 Ruby 中,除非定义,否则为什么不会`foo = true?(foo)` 进行赋值?
发布评论