将Access 2000转换为2003

本文介绍了将Access 2000转换为2003的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

我为一个从Access 2000迁移到Access的组织工作 2003.大约5或6年前，我们从Access 97迁移到Access 2000， 否问题。将这些已经转换的数据库 转换为Access 2003时会遇到问题吗？我们还有2个mda'，这些转换没有问题，因为mda格式是 。我们不再拥有制作mda的mdb。我需要注意其他的细微差别吗？ 提前致谢， Mark

I work for an organization that is migrating from Access 2000 to Access 2003. About 5 or 6 years ago we migrated from Access 97 to Access 2000 with no problem. Will I have trouble converting these already converted databases to Access 2003? We also have 2 mda''s, will these convert with no problem in the mda format. We no longer have the mdb that made the mda. Are there any other nuances that I need to look out for? Thanks in advance, Mark

推荐答案

2007年3月19日星期一21:19:20 -0400，NEWSGROUPS < he ****** @ yahoo> 写道： 通常，从A2000 MDB到A2003 MDB的转换非常简单。为什么 不需要几分钟就可以试试。 MDA是工作组信息文件的旧扩展，与 相关访问安全性（.MDW是更新的扩展）。他们不是从MDB创建的。也许你的意思是MDE？在这种情况下，你会遇到麻烦，因为你丢失了应用程序的源代码。 丢失MDB文件真的不是很聪明。 幸运的是，在A2003和A2007中，A2000 MDE文件在 兼容模式下正常运行。对于未来版本：您的里程可能会有所不同。 -Tom。 On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:19:20 -0400, "NEWSGROUPS" <he******@yahoo> wrote: Typically the conversion from A2000 MDB to A2003 MDB is very easy. Why not take a few minutes and try it. MDA is the old extension for workgroup information files, related to Access security (.MDW is the more current extension). They were not created from MDBs. Perhaps you mean MDE? In that case you are in deep trouble, because you lost the source code of the applications. That was really not very smart to lose the MDB files. Fortunately A2000 MDE files run fine in A2003 and A2007, in compatibility mode. For future versions: your mileage may vary. -Tom. >我为一个工作从Access 2000迁移到Access的组织 2003。大约5或6年前，我们从Access 97迁移到Access 2000，没有问题。将这些已经转换的数据库转换为Access 2003时，我会遇到问题吗？我们还有2个mda'，这些转换在mda格式没问题。我们不再拥有制作mda的mdb。是否还有其他需要注意的细微差别？ 提前致谢， Mark >I work for an organization that is migrating from Access 2000 to Access2003. About 5 or 6 years ago we migrated from Access 97 to Access 2000 withno problem. Will I have trouble converting these already converted databasesto Access 2003? We also have 2 mda''s, will these convert with no problem inthe mda format. We no longer have the mdb that made the mda. Are there anyother nuances that I need to look out for?Thanks in advance,Mark

3月19日下午6:38，Tom van Stiphout< no.spam.tom7 ... @ coxwrote： On Mar 19, 6:38 pm, Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7...@coxwrote: On Mon，19 2007年3月21日19:20 -0400，NEWSGROUPS < herei ... @ yahoo> 写道： 通常，从A2000 MDB到A2003 MDB的转换非常简单。为什么 不需要几分钟就可以试试。 MDA是工作组信息文件的旧扩展，与 相关访问安全性（.MDW是更新的扩展）。他们不是从MDB创建的。也许你的意思是MDE？在这种情况下，你会遇到麻烦，因为你丢失了应用程序的源代码。 丢失MDB文件真的不是很聪明。 幸运的是，在A2003和A2007中，A2000 MDE文件在 兼容模式下正常运行。对于未来版本：您的里程可能会有所不同。 -Tom。 On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:19:20 -0400, "NEWSGROUPS" <herei...@yahoo> wrote: Typically the conversion from A2000 MDB to A2003 MDB is very easy. Why not take a few minutes and try it. MDA is the old extension for workgroup information files, related to Access security (.MDW is the more current extension). They were not created from MDBs. Perhaps you mean MDE? In that case you are in deep trouble, because you lost the source code of the applications. That was really not very smart to lose the MDB files. Fortunately A2000 MDE files run fine in A2003 and A2007, in compatibility mode. For future versions: your mileage may vary. -Tom. 我为从Access迁移的组织工作2000年访问 2003.大约5或6年前，我们从Access 97迁移到Access 2000， 没问题。将这些已经转换的数据库 转换为Access 2003时会遇到问题吗？我们还有2个mda'，这些转换没有问题，因为mda格式是 。我们不再拥有制作mda的mdb。还有什么需要注意的其他细微差别吗？ I work for an organization that is migrating from Access 2000 to Access 2003. About 5 or 6 years ago we migrated from Access 97 to Access 2000 with no problem. Will I have trouble converting these already converted databases to Access 2003? We also have 2 mda''s, will these convert with no problem in the mda format. We no longer have the mdb that made the mda. Are there any other nuances that I need to look out for?

提前致谢， Mark-隐藏引用文字 - Thanks in advance, Mark- Hide quoted text -

- 显示引用的文字 -

- Show quoted text -

fyi - mda代表Access Add-in我相信。本质上是一个 库，它与内容中的mdb文件完全相同（即 表格，模块，报告等）。

fyi - an mda stands for Access Add-in I believe. Essentially a library and it is exactly the same as an mdb file in content (that is, forms, modules, reports, etc).

其实我的意思是mda。我从来没有创建过一个mda，所以我不知道这是什么原因。我们的一个程序员创建了2个mda'，我们使用它们作为添加 ins（通过引用）。你是对的，因为他们打开普通数据库 ，我们可以根据需要添加代码。所以说，你是否告诉我，只要他们在Access 2000中编译，他们将在2003年开放时转换为 无错误？ 问候， Mark " NEWSGROUPS" <他****** @ yahoo写了留言 新闻：B _ ************************ ******@comcast。 .. Actually I did mean mda. I have never created an mda so I was unaware as to what it was. One of our programmers created 2 mda''s and we use them as add ins(through references). You are right as they do open as normal databases and we can add code as needed. So that being said, are you telling me that they will convert when opened in 2003 as long as they compile in Access 2000 error free? Regards, Mark "NEWSGROUPS" <he******@yahoowrote in message news:B_******************************@comcast. .. >我为从Access 2000迁移到Access的组织工作 2003。大约5或6年前，我们从Access 97迁移到Access 2000，没有问题。将这些已经转换的数据库转换为Access 2003时，我会遇到问题吗？我们还有2个mda'，这些转换时没有mda格式的问题。我们不再拥有制作mda的mdb。是否还有其他需要注意的细微差别？ 提前致谢， Mark >I work for an organization that is migrating from Access 2000 to Access2003. About 5 or 6 years ago we migrated from Access 97 to Access 2000 withno problem. Will I have trouble converting these already converteddatabases to Access 2003? We also have 2 mda''s, will these convert with noproblem in the mda format. We no longer have the mdb that made the mda. Arethere any other nuances that I need to look out for? Thanks in advance, Mark