函数指向类成员函数的指针

本文介绍了函数指向类成员函数的指针的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

我想让函数指针作为参数。

I want to make function which has function pointer as a parameter.

#include <iostream> using namespace std; class test{ public: test(){}; double tt(double input){ return input; }; }; double fptr_test(double (*fptr)(double), double input){ return fptr(input); } int main(){ test t; cout << t.tt(3) << endl; cout << fptr_test(t.tt, 3) << endl; // This line doesn't work cout << fptr_test(&test::tt, 3) << endl; // This line can't compile return 1; }

但它不工作。 我如何传递类成员函数作为参数？

But it doesn't work. How could I pass class member function as a parameter?

我可以在没有实例化的情况下调用成员函数吗？

Can I call the member function without instantiation?

推荐答案

函数指针和成员函数指针具有不兼容的类型。例如，& test :: tt 的类型是

A function pointer and a member function pointer have incompatible types. For example, the type of &test::tt is

double (test::*)(double)

而不是

double (*)(double)

这个区别的原因是一个[非 - static ]成员函数有一个隐藏参数：成员函数应用的对象的指针， code> this 。从成员函数中移除正常函数指针的方法是通过提供这个指针的函数进行委托，因此需要一个额外的参数。

The reason for this difference is that a [non-static] member function has a hidden parameter: the pointer to the object the member function is applied, too, i.e., this. The way to a normal function pointer out of a member function is to delegate via a function which supplies the this pointer and, thus, takes an extra argument.

在C ++中，不是将函数指针作为函数的参数，这些函数可以由函数定制，而是采用一个函数对象。这种方法有两种风格：

In C++ it is much more useful to not take function pointers as arguments to functions which can be customized by a function but rather to take a function object. This approach comes in two flavors:

快速的方法是让函数对象类型为模板参数，函数对象。例如， fptr_test（）将如下所示： template <typename Fun> double fptr_test(Fun fun, double input) { return fun(input); }

使用的隐含 a double 参数，其结果可转换为 double 。

The implicit concept used is a function callable with a double argument which yields are result convertible to double.

特别是当被调用的函数需要单独编译时，使用模板为每种类型的函数对象是不可行的。在这种情况下，使用类型擦除的表示，即 std :: function< ...> ，例如：

Especially when the functions being called need to be compiled separately, using a template for each kind of function object isn't viable. In that case it is much more reasonable to use a type-erased representation, i.e., std::function<...>, e.g.:

double fptr_test(std::function<double(double)> fun, double input) { return fun(input); }

函数对象只需要一个参数，而你的成员函数有两个：调用函数on的对象和 double 参数。你可以 std :: bind（...）第一个参数传递给 fptr_test（）：

In both cases the function object takes just one argument while your member function takes two: the object to call the function on and the double argument. You'd std::bind(...) the first argument to an object and pass the resulting object to fptr_test():

test object; std::cout << fptr_test(std:bind(&test::tt, &object, std::placeholders::_1), 3) << '\n'; std::cout << fptr_test([&](double input){ return object.tt(input); }, 3) << '\n';

代码使用两种单独的方法绑定对象：第一种使用 std :: bind（），而第二个使用lambda函数。这两个调用都应该同时执行 fptr_test（）。

The code uses two separate approaches to bind the object: the first uses std::bind() while the second uses a lambda function. Both of these calls should work with both of the implementation of fptr_test() provided.