构建IDE /编译器所需的概念

本文介绍了构建IDE /编译器所需的概念的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

当涉及到IDE（例如SharpDevelop）或编译器/语言解析器时，我需要知道什么计算机科学的主题？我不希望有一个完整的深入的教程列表，但只是一个列表的主题，这将有利于我的改进。

When it comes to making an IDE (e.g. SharpDevelop) or a compiler/language parser, what topics of computer science do I need to know? I don't expect a full list of in depth tutorials but just a list of topics which would benefit me in improving.

我是正确的认为解析器有一些规则关于语言的语法/语义，并验证基于这些规则的代码？这看起来像一个简单的方法？

Am I right in thinking a parser has some rules about the syntax/semantics of a language, and validates the code based on these rules? That seems like a simple approach?

感谢

推荐答案

，编译器和调试器是三个不同的野兽。

An IDE, a compiler and a debugger are three different beasts.

这里是一个快速和稍微随机选择一些链接，我发现有趣或鼓舞人心的时候，对于模拟语言，这是尽可能接近IDE：

Here's a quick and slightly random selection of some links that I've found interesting or inspiring when thinking about building modeling tools for simulation languages, which is as close as I get to IDE:

• 高性能GUI
• Magic Ink - 可编程信息而不是互动
• 动态语言的动态IDE （Bracha还设计了Java的调试镜像接口，另一个IDE需要的东西）
• 信息设计模式 - GUI的一般示例
• 问题带有选项卡式界面（虽然当代码的每一页看起来都相同时，图标并没有太多用处;也许生成的图标就像这里的工作）
• 开发多模式用户界面的常见建议 - 如果表达你的代码的最好方法是挥动你的手，或给一个错误一个严厉的对话。
• Pinocchio问题 - 类似的是Bracha的帖子，关于修补正在运行的框架

• The High Performance GUI
• Magic Ink - programmable information rather than interaction
• Edward Tufte - imagine if your working life was spent looking at information made this beautiful.
• Dynamic IDEs for Dynamic Languages (Bracha also designed Java's debugging mirror interface, another thing an IDE needs)
• Information Design Patterns - general examples of GUIs
• Problems with tabbed interfaces (though icons aren't much use either when each page of code looks the same; maybe generated icons like the ones here would work)
• Common Sense Suggestions for Developing Multimodal User Interfaces - what if the best way to express your code is to wave your hands around, or give a bug a stern talking to.
• The Pinocchio Problem - similar are to Bracha's post, about patching a running framework

这些链接有一些偏向于模式，以帮助阅读和浏览，以及用户在使用它们而不是作为单独的循环时扩展的系统;如果你想要一个面向任务的界面或静态插件，现有的IDE，如Eclipse的项目是可以看的。

There's somewhat of a bias in those links towards patterns to help reading and browsing rather than writing code, and towards systems the user extends while using them rather than as a separate cycle; if you want a task-oriented interface or static plugins, projects for existing IDEs such as Eclipse are the place to look.