Java数据传输对象命名约定？

本文介绍了Java数据传输对象命名约定？的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！ 问题描述

鉴于这种情况，你有一个客户端库传递给API的传输对象（POJO只有getter / setter），命名传输对象的最佳方法是什么？

Given this scenario where you have "transfer objects" (POJO's with just getters/setters) which are passed by a client library to your API, what is the best way to name the transfer objects?

package com.x.core; public class Car { private String make; private String model; public Car(com.x.clientapi.Car car) { this.make = car.getMake(); this.model = car.getModel(); } }

在此示例中，您的主类和转移对象都是名称 Car 。它们有不同的包装，但我认为拥有相同的名称令人困惑。是否有关于如何命名传输对象的最佳实践？

In this example your main class and your transfer object both have the name Car. They are in different packages but I think it's confusing to have the same name. Is there a best practice on how to name the transfer objects?

推荐答案

我通常将'DTO'添加到类的末尾名称以及将所有DTO放在他们自己的包中。在您的示例中，我将其称为com.x.core.dto.CarDTO。

I generally add 'DTO' to the end of the Class name as well as place all the DTO's in their own package. In your example I would call it com.x.core.dto.CarDTO.